[C++-sig] Re: Interest in luabind

[David Abrahams]

Rene Rivera <grafik666 at redshift-software.com> writes:

> I thought that for such a restructuring you would not want to mess with the
> current BP, even if on a branch? 

That's what branches are for!

> But I can see that it would be easier than copying over a bunch of
> BP code.

Yep.

> Any ideas/preferences on: Where do we discuss the refactoring of the
> common code and the laubind dev? It seems like noise polution to
> keep it on this list. Daniel do you have a non-user list set up for
> LuaBind? Or we can add a list to the SF boost project.

I prefer here, but only a little.  Those interested in Boost.Python
internals (I'm thinking of people like Brett Calcott and Dirk Gerrits
here) would have to subscribe to whatever other forum we pick.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com