[C++-sig] What's wrong here? (BPL V2)
David Abrahams
david.abrahams at rcn.com
Fri Jun 14 02:44:46 CEST 2002
From: "Dominic Sacré" <bugcreator at gmx.de>
<<Ah, you're right, it's indeed an exception I didn't catch:
ReferenceError: Attempt to return dangling internal reference>>
That's still strange. What was the context? The built-in handle_exception()
function should have converted this to something visible in Python.
<<<Constructing an additional handle<> doesn't change anything, I still get
the same error...>>
First remember that a handle<> adopts by default; to get it to increment
the reference count you need to pass the PyObject* through the borrow()
function.
<<In which situations would no converter be registered? Or do I somehow
have
to register a converter myself? Should/could these not be registered
automatically, at least for simple classes?>>
No, it's not possible to determine how simple a class is and register
converters automatically on that basis
Converters are registered for classes declared with class_<>.
There are also built-in converters registered for complex<T> and
std::string, though not lvalue converters (these are converted to/from the
corresponding Python types).
-Dave
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list