[C++-sig] Silly naming question

[David Abrahams]

 As I revise the class_<> interface to use object instead of handle<>, I
came across

    .setattr("name", obj)

and I'm just wondering if the name "bind" wouldn't be more appropriate here
than a tweaky abbreviation like setattr:

    .bind("name", value)

I'm mildly +1 on this change before we release the library.

Other votes?

           ---------------------------------
           David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave at boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com