[core-workflow] Final chance to express opinion on history rewrite for issue #s

[Mariatta Wijaya]

+1

On Feb 10, 2017 6:00 AM, "Senthil Kumaran" <senthil at uthcode.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Senthil Kumaran <senthil at uthcode.com>
> wrote:
> > Please view the output of commit logs converted here
> > http://orsenthil.github.io/cpython-hg-to-git/ and see if it looks
> > better than the status quo.
>
> In addition to the random sampling of the commit logs, here is the
> complete repo converted
> while the commit message re-write:
>
> https://github.com/orsenthil/cpython-migration-test3
>
> Both commit log samples and the repo conversion looks good to me
> And I am in favor of going ahead with this approach. +1 as it was
> previously too.
>
> Since seeing the commit log conversion yesterday, I suspect more
> people would be +1 one.
>
> If any of you were -1 yesterday and you changed your mind after seeing
> the results, please take chance to explicitly toggle your vote.
> --
> Senthil
> _______________________________________________
> core-workflow mailing list
> core-workflow at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
> This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
> https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20170210/3b0750e6/attachment.html>