[core-workflow] Questions about the proposed workflows

[Donald Stufft]

It seems pretty hypocritical to be against GitHub because it's proprietary and hosted by a company that can sell your data (both things I've seen people say against GitHub) and be pro GitLab EE (either hosted by Gitlab or ourselves) or pro using a Hosted Gitlab. I don't personally have a problem with it, I'm fine with the tooling not being free but it seems disingenuous to treat Gitlab EE (as opposed CE) as if it's free software. I'm particularly interested in a managed option of some kind to reduce to load on the infra team. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 11, 2015, at 11:57 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> a. GitLab EE instance hosted and managed by GitLab, Inc
> b. GitLab EE instance hosted by the PSF, and managed by GitLab, Inc
> c. GitLab EE instance hosted and managed by the PSF
> d. GitLab CE instance hosted and managed by the PSF