[Catalog-sig] [Proposal] Registered packages must provide the source code distribution on PyPI

Andreas Jung lists at zopyx.com
Fri Jun 18 05:35:44 CEST 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> In theory yes, in real life no - I approached several package
>> maintainers in the past due to several reasons..some agree with the
>> complaints, others just don't care. Some consider PyPI as their own
>> private repository with their own rules and no need to care about the
>> community e.g. by providing proper metadata (I call this anti-social and
>> PyPI-misuse).
> 
> As the PyPI maintainer, I assure you that it is no misuse. Whether it's
> anti-social, I don't know.

ok - so you claim that it should be allowed for everyone to unload its
unlabeled garbage on public places?
> 
> So given that discussion, I'm now opposed to enforcing a policy here.

Ok - so we have live with PyPI as a package dumpster.

Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwa6Y8ACgkQCJIWIbr9KYyH5ACcDgFo+H3fjpUWyAWc8L/V+dcP
MU8AnjdVWUfmaPSl3l74kOYAg/rKhdTv
=Ht7H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lists.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20100618/719a3a90/attachment.vcf>


More information about the Catalog-SIG mailing list