From chris at simplistix.co.uk Fri Dec 12 13:20:46 2008 From: chris at simplistix.co.uk (Chris Withers) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:20:46 +0000 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? Message-ID: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> Hi All, Any idea why my ReST isn't rendering for these packages: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/testfixtures http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mailinglogger Also, the search and front-page-newest-packages appear to be broken... cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk From martin at v.loewis.de Sat Dec 13 00:08:51 2008 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:08:51 +0100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? In-Reply-To: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> References: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> Message-ID: <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> > Any idea why my ReST isn't rendering for these packages: > > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/testfixtures > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mailinglogger Can you elaborate? It looks fine to me. > Also, the search and front-page-newest-packages appear to be broken... Again, I can't quite follow. What specifically looks incorrect? Regards, Martin From chris at simplistix.co.uk Sat Dec 13 00:08:20 2008 From: chris at simplistix.co.uk (Chris Withers) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:08:20 +0000 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? In-Reply-To: <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> References: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <4942EEE4.9060108@simplistix.co.uk> Martin v. L?wis wrote: >> Any idea why my ReST isn't rendering for these packages: >> >> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/testfixtures >> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mailinglogger > > Can you elaborate? It looks fine to me. This was a ReST problem. >> Also, the search and front-page-newest-packages appear to be broken... > > Again, I can't quite follow. What specifically looks incorrect? http://pypi.python.org/pypi ...lists nothing for me currently, it usually lists the latest added packaged. Also, searching for 'buildout' currently returns nothing, it usually returns loads of hits. Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk From martin at v.loewis.de Sat Dec 13 00:20:23 2008 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:20:23 +0100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? In-Reply-To: <4942EEE4.9060108@simplistix.co.uk> References: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> <4942EEE4.9060108@simplistix.co.uk> Message-ID: <4942F1B7.5080909@v.loewis.de> >> >> Again, I can't quite follow. What specifically looks incorrect? > > http://pypi.python.org/pypi > > ...lists nothing for me currently, it usually lists the latest added > packaged. Not so for me. I see the newest package as 2008-12-12 django-frontendadmin 0.3 A a set of templatetags to allow an easy and unobstrusive way to edit model-data in the frontend of your page. and the oldest as 2008-12-12 go 1.2.0 Quick directory changing (super-cd) > Also, searching for 'buildout' currently returns nothing, it usually > returns loads of hits. I get loads of hits, right now. Can anybody confirm Chris' observation? Or, better yet, offer an explanation? Regards, Martin From renesd at gmail.com Sat Dec 13 00:22:18 2008 From: renesd at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Dudfield?=) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:22:18 +1100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? In-Reply-To: <4942F1B7.5080909@v.loewis.de> References: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> <4942EEE4.9060108@simplistix.co.uk> <4942F1B7.5080909@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <64ddb72c0812121522i1ecf45d8qac9f5be7ba209ddf@mail.gmail.com> Works for me. Are you logged in? That could be a difference. On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:20 AM, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >>> >>> Again, I can't quite follow. What specifically looks incorrect? >> >> http://pypi.python.org/pypi >> >> ...lists nothing for me currently, it usually lists the latest added >> packaged. > > Not so for me. I see the newest package as > > 2008-12-12 django-frontendadmin 0.3 A a set of templatetags to allow > an easy and unobstrusive way to edit model-data in the frontend of your > page. > > and the oldest as > > 2008-12-12 go 1.2.0 Quick directory changing (super-cd) > >> Also, searching for 'buildout' currently returns nothing, it usually >> returns loads of hits. > > I get loads of hits, right now. > > Can anybody confirm Chris' observation? Or, better yet, offer an > explanation? > > Regards, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > Catalog-SIG at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig > From chris at simplistix.co.uk Sat Dec 13 00:21:22 2008 From: chris at simplistix.co.uk (Chris Withers) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:21:22 +0000 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? In-Reply-To: <4942F1B7.5080909@v.loewis.de> References: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> <4942EEE4.9060108@simplistix.co.uk> <4942F1B7.5080909@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <4942F1F2.3010409@simplistix.co.uk> Martin v. L?wis wrote: > Can anybody confirm Chris' observation? Or, better yet, offer an > explanation? I can. I looked mroe closely and both problems are the result of the PyPI UI doing a pretty bad job when you own a lot of packages and you're logged in. I have a *lot* of packages that I maintain, so the bar on the right pushes any other useful content down way off the bottom of my browser. Any chance of this getting fixed? Chris PS: Management groups would be good too... -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk From martin at v.loewis.de Sat Dec 13 00:36:13 2008 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:36:13 +0100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? In-Reply-To: <4942F1F2.3010409@simplistix.co.uk> References: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> <4942EEE4.9060108@simplistix.co.uk> <4942F1B7.5080909@v.loewis.de> <4942F1F2.3010409@simplistix.co.uk> Message-ID: <4942F56D.3050302@v.loewis.de> > I can. I looked mroe closely and both problems are the result of the > PyPI UI doing a pretty bad job when you own a lot of packages and you're > logged in. > > I have a *lot* of packages that I maintain, so the bar on the right > pushes any other useful content down way off the bottom of my browser. > > Any chance of this getting fixed? I wish I knew what "this" is that you want to be fixed. Can you please make a precise problem description to the PyPI bug tracker? (explain, in particular, what "a lot of packages" means precisely). > PS: Management groups would be good too... I don't understand that remark. What is a "management group"? Regards, Martin From chris at simplistix.co.uk Sat Dec 13 00:36:52 2008 From: chris at simplistix.co.uk (Chris Withers) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:36:52 +0000 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? In-Reply-To: <4942F56D.3050302@v.loewis.de> References: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> <4942EEE4.9060108@simplistix.co.uk> <4942F1B7.5080909@v.loewis.de> <4942F1F2.3010409@simplistix.co.uk> <4942F56D.3050302@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <4942F594.3040303@simplistix.co.uk> Martin v. L?wis wrote: >> I have a *lot* of packages that I maintain, so the bar on the right >> pushes any other useful content down way off the bottom of my browser. >> >> Any chance of this getting fixed? > > I wish I knew what "this" is that you want to be fixed. Generally, 'this' means 'whatever I was just describing', in this case: >> I have a *lot* of packages that I maintain, so the bar on the right >> pushes any other useful content down way off the bottom of my >> browser. > make a precise problem description to the PyPI bug tracker? Where's that? >> PS: Management groups would be good too... > > I don't understand that remark. What is a "management group"? Currently, packages can only be owned by an individual. This is annoying when a package is maintained by a group of people, as each person in the group has to manually have *all* the packages added to their username by someone who already has joint ownership of them. Launchpad does a pretty good job of this... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk From martin at v.loewis.de Sat Dec 13 01:09:06 2008 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:09:06 +0100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] problems with PyPI? In-Reply-To: <4942F594.3040303@simplistix.co.uk> References: <4942571E.6010605@simplistix.co.uk> <4942EF03.5040700@v.loewis.de> <4942EEE4.9060108@simplistix.co.uk> <4942F1B7.5080909@v.loewis.de> <4942F1F2.3010409@simplistix.co.uk> <4942F56D.3050302@v.loewis.de> <4942F594.3040303@simplistix.co.uk> Message-ID: <4942FD22.1080101@v.loewis.de> >> make a precise problem description to the PyPI bug tracker? > > Where's that? Follow the link "Bug reports", to http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?group_id=66150&atid=513503 >> I don't understand that remark. What is a "management group"? > > Currently, packages can only be owned by an individual. > This is annoying when a package is maintained by a group of people, as > each person in the group has to manually have *all* the packages added > to their username by someone who already has joint ownership of them. (I had to read it three times to understand what you mean - you want to have people join a group, and then make the group owner of the package) Feel free to submit a bug report/feature request. This is a significant change, so in absence of a patch, don't expect that PyPI will change here any time soon. Regards, Martin From jantod at gmail.com Thu Dec 18 15:20:29 2008 From: jantod at gmail.com (Janto Dreijer) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:20:29 +0200 Subject: [Catalog-sig] date of a package release Message-ID: Hi! I'm creating an index of the various SciPy SciKits ( http://scikits.appspot.com/ ), and the date of a package release would be helpful. I have yet to see a DOAP record on PyPI with the Project.release.Version.created RDF value filled in. Why is this? The XML-RPC interface also doesn't return any dates. (Except for the changelog method. But I can't really use that as Google App Engine truncates data from remote servers if it gets too long.) So my question: how do I go about getting the release date of a package? Regards Janto From martin at v.loewis.de Fri Dec 19 00:27:07 2008 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:27:07 +0100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] date of a package release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <494ADC4B.8040604@v.loewis.de> > So my question: how do I go about getting the release date of a package? You can find out the file release dates from the http file index listings. The package release date itself is available only from the changelog, which is available through XML-RPC. Regards, Martin From jantod at gmail.com Fri Dec 19 00:44:13 2008 From: jantod at gmail.com (Janto Dreijer) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:44:13 +0200 Subject: [Catalog-sig] date of a package release In-Reply-To: <494ADC4B.8040604@v.loewis.de> References: <494ADC4B.8040604@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: Maybe I'm just being stupid, but what do you mean "http file index listing"? Unfortunately I can't parse the results of the changelog method as Google App Engine's quotas and XML's verbosity is not working that well together. Is there a reason the XML-RPC release_data() method doesn't return a date? Regards Janto On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:27 AM, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >> So my question: how do I go about getting the release date of a package? > > You can find out the file release dates from the http file index > listings. The package release date itself is available only from > the changelog, which is available through XML-RPC. > > Regards, > Martin > From martin at v.loewis.de Fri Dec 19 07:13:39 2008 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:13:39 +0100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] date of a package release In-Reply-To: References: <494ADC4B.8040604@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <494B3B93.3070502@v.loewis.de> > Maybe I'm just being stupid, but what do you mean "http file index listing"? http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/h/hatom2atom/ > Is there a reason the XML-RPC release_data() method doesn't return a date? Yes: the release data in the database don't have a date stored, so it can't return one. Regards, Martin From jantod at gmail.com Fri Dec 19 10:39:39 2008 From: jantod at gmail.com (Janto Dreijer) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:39:39 +0200 Subject: [Catalog-sig] date of a package release In-Reply-To: <494B3B93.3070502@v.loewis.de> References: <494ADC4B.8040604@v.loewis.de> <494B3B93.3070502@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:13 AM, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >> Maybe I'm just being stupid, but what do you mean "http file index listing"? > > http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/h/hatom2atom/ > Oh, I see! Thankyou! Regards Janto From james.utter at gmail.com Tue Dec 23 04:21:25 2008 From: james.utter at gmail.com (James Utter) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:21:25 +1100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] PIL download link broken Message-ID: <6c90b3e90812221921s2810aa0bg7141979b95122a76@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I don't know if this is the right place to report this, so please direct me elsewhere if necessary. I have noticed that the download link for the Python Imaging Libraries 1.1.6 is broken. It does not point to the package, but rather a website where the package is located. This breaks it's installation with easy_install and pip. Thanks, James Utter $ easy_install PIL Searching for PIL Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/PIL/ Reading http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil Reading http://effbot.org/zone/pil-changes-115.htm Reading http://effbot.org/downloads/#Imaging No local packages or download links found for PIL $ easy_install Imaging Searching for Imaging Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Imaging/ Couldn't find index page for 'Imaging' (maybe misspelled?) Scanning index of all packages (this may take a while) Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ No local packages or download links found for Imaging error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('Imaging') $ pip install -E venv PIL==1.1.6 Downloading/unpacking PIL==1.1.6 Could not fetch URL http://pypi.python.org/simple/PIL/1.1.6: HTTP Error 404: Not Found Will skip URL http://pypi.python.org/simple/PIL/1.1.6 when looking for download links for PIL==1.1.6 Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement PIL==1.1.6 (from versions: wmf-1.0b2-20040224) No distributions matching the version for PIL==1.1.6 Storing complete log in ./pip-log.txt From lists at zopyx.com Tue Dec 23 06:36:08 2008 From: lists at zopyx.com (Andreas Jung) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:36:08 +0100 Subject: [Catalog-sig] PIL download link broken In-Reply-To: <6c90b3e90812221921s2810aa0bg7141979b95122a76@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c90b3e90812221921s2810aa0bg7141979b95122a76@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <495078C8.5020009@zopyx.com> On 23.12.2008 4:21 Uhr, James Utter wrote: > Hello, > > I don't know if this is the right place to report this, so please > direct me elsewhere if necessary. Contact the package maintainers - in this case: Pythonware -aj -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lists.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 316 bytes Desc: not available URL: