From fdrake at gmail.com  Mon Oct  1 20:51:50 2007
From: fdrake at gmail.com (Fred Drake)
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:51:50 -0400
Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI appears down
Message-ID: <9cee7ab80710011151r67250077o491adb5f1d32d858@mail.gmail.com>

PyPI is down, as far as I can tell (so is the wiki).


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fdrake at gmail.com>
"Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller

From benji at benjiyork.com  Mon Oct  1 20:39:49 2007
From: benji at benjiyork.com (Benji York)
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:39:49 -0400
Subject: [Catalog-sig]  PyPI down
Message-ID: <47013EF5.20003@benjiyork.com>

As is my sworn duty, I have the sad news to relay that PyPI is, 
regrettably, down.
-- 
Benji York
http://benjiyork.com


From bernd.roessl at lovelysystems.com  Mon Oct  1 21:04:36 2007
From: bernd.roessl at lovelysystems.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernd_R=F6ssl?=)
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:04:36 -0400
Subject: [Catalog-sig] cheeseshop and pypi unreachable
Message-ID: <3360371C-279E-4D15-8824-A2BEFF5111B6@lovelysystems.com>


Hey there,

http://pypi.python.org and http://cheeseshop.python.org are not  
reachable.  Both host can be pinged but the web is not responding.  
The actual problem is that my buildout is not running without one of  
this hosts.

cheers, bernd


--
Lovely Systems, Developer

phone: +43 5572 908060, fax: +43 5572 908060-77
Schmelzh?tterstra?e 26a, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20071001/5d359c28/attachment.htm 

From jim at zope.com  Mon Oct  1 21:45:29 2007
From: jim at zope.com (Jim Fulton)
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:45:29 -0400
Subject: [Catalog-sig] cheeseshop and pypi unreachable
In-Reply-To: <3360371C-279E-4D15-8824-A2BEFF5111B6@lovelysystems.com>
References: <3360371C-279E-4D15-8824-A2BEFF5111B6@lovelysystems.com>
Message-ID: <2F8E6ACB-E798-46BE-B37B-EA2247FA442D@zope.com>

Use http://download.zope.org/ppix/.

Jim

On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Bernd R?ssl wrote:

>
> Hey there,
>
> http://pypi.python.org and http://cheeseshop.python.org are not  
> reachable.  Both host can be pinged but the web is not responding.  
> The actual problem is that my buildout is not running without one  
> of this hosts.
>
> cheers, bernd
>
>
> --
> Lovely Systems, Developer
>
> phone: +43 5572 908060, fax: +43 5572 908060-77
> Schmelzh?tterstra?e 26a, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation



From VernM at berkeleyprocess.com  Wed Oct  3 03:10:47 2007
From: VernM at berkeleyprocess.com (Vern Muhr)
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:10:47 -0700
Subject: [Catalog-sig] How to make the Package index more useful
Message-ID: <629D57CE75B2E54297B30B69F147621A038B2EF7@exch1.bpc.lan>

Greetings,

I check the package index almost every day. More and more it seems to be filled with every single change that occurs to a few code basees (Zope, Plone, etc) no matter how trivial. I don't understand why these development teams don't have their own SIG to post this stuff to. It does makes sense to post major new releases to the Package Index. Often now, it seems that these minor package changes bump other packages off the bottom of the visible list, or at least make it a task to find anything of interest.

Is anyone else annoyed by this?

I mean this to be constructive input. I'm not dissing these developers.

Best regards, Vern Muhr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20071002/bc1303b7/attachment.htm 

From pje at telecommunity.com  Wed Oct  3 04:33:12 2007
From: pje at telecommunity.com (Phillip J. Eby)
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:33:12 -0400
Subject: [Catalog-sig] How to make the Package index more useful
In-Reply-To: <629D57CE75B2E54297B30B69F147621A038B2EF7@exch1.bpc.lan>
References: <629D57CE75B2E54297B30B69F147621A038B2EF7@exch1.bpc.lan>
Message-ID: <20071003023034.D4FC73A407A@sparrow.telecommunity.com>

At 06:10 PM 10/2/2007 -0700, Vern Muhr wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8055A.3AF0387D"
>
>Greetings,
>
>I check the package index almost every day. More and more it seems 
>to be filled with every single change that occurs to a few code 
>basees (Zope, Plone, etc) no matter how trivial. I don't understand 
>why these development teams don't have their own SIG to post this 
>stuff to. It does makes sense to post major new releases to the 
>Package Index. Often now, it seems that these minor package changes 
>bump other packages off the bottom of the visible list, or at least 
>make it a task to find anything of interest.

May I suggest using an RSS reader, such as Bloglines or Google 
Reader?  These services will show you a complete history of changes, 
without any ability for you to "miss" anything.


From martin at v.loewis.de  Wed Oct  3 15:55:59 2007
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:55:59 +0200
Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI down
In-Reply-To: <47013EF5.20003@benjiyork.com>
References: <47013EF5.20003@benjiyork.com>
Message-ID: <47039F6F.1050605@v.loewis.de>

> As is my sworn duty, I have the sad news to relay that PyPI is, 
> regrettably, down.

Thanks. I still can't figure out what precise sequence of events
causes that problem, but I added another criterion for restarting
Apache which would have hit in this instance.

Regards,
Martin

From paul at boddie.org.uk  Tue Oct 23 01:06:31 2007
From: paul at boddie.org.uk (Paul Boddie)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:06:31 +0200
Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI Front Page Package Ordering
Message-ID: <200710230106.31379.paul@boddie.org.uk>

Hello,

I notice (at around 20071022T230500Z, as some might say) that PyPI is showing 
for "recent packages" the first 30 packages in the database sorted by 
ascending version number, or something similar. Perhaps some query isn't 
quite as it might seem.

Regards,

Paul


From martin at v.loewis.de  Tue Oct 23 06:36:51 2007
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:36:51 +0200
Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI Front Page Package Ordering
In-Reply-To: <200710230106.31379.paul@boddie.org.uk>
References: <200710230106.31379.paul@boddie.org.uk>
Message-ID: <471D7A63.30302@v.loewis.de>

> I notice (at around 20071022T230500Z, as some might say) that PyPI is showing 
> for "recent packages" the first 30 packages in the database sorted by 
> ascending version number, or something similar. Perhaps some query isn't 
> quite as it might seem.

Thanks for pointing that out. Indeed, it was not - an "order by" clause
was missing. This is a fallback case only if "too many" recent releases
are immediately set to hidden, so it was rarely tested. It's now fixed.

Regards,
Martin