From wichert at wiggy.net  Tue Feb  6 12:50:14 2007
From: wichert at wiggy.net (Wichert Akkerman)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:50:14 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Framework :: Plone classifier
Message-ID: <20070206115014.GI3254@wiggy.net>

Hello,

the Plone content manangement system is currently moving rapidly down
the path of switching to use of eggs and python packages for its
components and extensions. The next release (3.0) will be the first one
using these and already includes 21 packages. Since our deployment
and development tools are moving towards increased usage of eggs and the
cheeseshop all of those will be submitted to the cheesehop as well. The
first couple are already in, the rest should be following this week.

In order to group these packages and make it easy for people to find
Plone components and extensions it would be very useful for us if there
is a 'Framework :: Plone' classifier we could use. Can you consider
adding that?

Wichert (Plone 3 release manager)

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.

From richardjones at optushome.com.au  Mon Feb 12 00:16:03 2007
From: richardjones at optushome.com.au (Richard Jones)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:16:03 +1100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Cheese shop: search
In-Reply-To: <9cee7ab80610200941l72a06d38tc81be933293777de@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4517FAEA.3010801@colorstudy.com> <4538F632.4010302@colorstudy.com>
	<9cee7ab80610200941l72a06d38tc81be933293777de@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <200702121016.03396.richardjones@optushome.com.au>

On Saturday 21 October 2006 02:41, Fred Drake wrote:
> On 10/20/06, Ian Bicking <ianb at colorstudy.com> wrote:
> > I thought my email outlined why the Google search is completely useless.
> >   To summarize: it's useless.  The old search was a little awkward, but
> > it worked.  Simply putting it back as it was would be a step forward.
>
> Agreed!

I actually found the time needed to replace the Google search this morning.

Just waiting for the Apache process restart for the code to go live.


   Richard

From richardjones at optushome.com.au  Mon Feb 12 00:17:12 2007
From: richardjones at optushome.com.au (Richard Jones)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:17:12 +1100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Cheese shop: search
In-Reply-To: <200702121016.03396.richardjones@optushome.com.au>
References: <4517FAEA.3010801@colorstudy.com>
	<9cee7ab80610200941l72a06d38tc81be933293777de@mail.gmail.com>
	<200702121016.03396.richardjones@optushome.com.au>
Message-ID: <200702121017.12278.richardjones@optushome.com.au>

On Monday 12 February 2007 10:16, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Saturday 21 October 2006 02:41, Fred Drake wrote:
> > On 10/20/06, Ian Bicking <ianb at colorstudy.com> wrote:
> > > I thought my email outlined why the Google search is completely
> > > useless. To summarize: it's useless.  The old search was a little
> > > awkward, but it worked.  Simply putting it back as it was would be a
> > > step forward.
> >
> > Agreed!
>
> I actually found the time needed to replace the Google search this morning.
>
> Just waiting for the Apache process restart for the code to go live.

(until the restart anyone using the search box will get a "Not Found" error)

From richardjones at optushome.com.au  Mon Feb 12 00:19:52 2007
From: richardjones at optushome.com.au (Richard Jones)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:19:52 +1100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Framework :: Plone classifier
In-Reply-To: <20070206115014.GI3254@wiggy.net>
References: <20070206115014.GI3254@wiggy.net>
Message-ID: <200702121019.52359.richardjones@optushome.com.au>

On Tuesday 06 February 2007 22:50, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> In order to group these packages and make it easy for people to find
> Plone components and extensions it would be very useful for us if there
> is a 'Framework :: Plone' classifier we could use. Can you consider
> adding that?

Sorry for the delay - the classifier has been added.


    Richard

ps. I noticed you just added a bunch of new packages to the index. If you fix 
the setup.py files and just re-run the "register" command that'll add the new 
classifier to the existing entries in the index.

From richard at commonground.com.au  Fri Feb 23 16:25:11 2007
From: richard at commonground.com.au (Richard Jones)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:25:11 -0600
Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI open space @ pycon
Message-ID: <F5B0AE07-EA3D-4BFB-AC3A-733E6C915589@commonground.com.au>

I've organised an open space session for 4:05PM tomorrow (after the  
afternoon break)

http://us.pycon.org/TX2007/OpenSpacePyPi


     Richard


From richardjones at optusnet.com.au  Fri Feb 23 18:37:37 2007
From: richardjones at optusnet.com.au (richardjones at optusnet.com.au)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 04:37:37 +1100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] PyPI open space @ pycon
Message-ID: <200702231737.l1NHbbou024548@mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20070224/9d9906ba/attachment.asc 

From sh at defuze.org  Tue Feb 27 14:18:48 2007
From: sh at defuze.org (Sylvain Hellegouarch)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:18:48 +0000
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Python implementations support
Message-ID: <45E42FB8.5010908@defuze.org>

All,

I was wondering if it would be valuable to add the information about
which implementation of the Python language a package support. With
IronPython, PyPY and Jython becoming more and more stable it could be
interesting for a package maintainer to indicate that his product
actually supports one or several of them.

>From a UI point of view it could be a simple multi select box. We don't
need to precise the level of support simply whether or not the
maintainer acknowledges his product has been in a way or the other
tested under different implementations.

Forgive me if this has been already discussed or is already provided.

- Sylvain

From martin at v.loewis.de  Wed Feb 28 00:34:08 2007
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:34:08 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Python implementations support
In-Reply-To: <45E42FB8.5010908@defuze.org>
References: <45E42FB8.5010908@defuze.org>
Message-ID: <45E4BFF0.7090604@v.loewis.de>

Sylvain Hellegouarch schrieb:
> I was wondering if it would be valuable to add the information about
> which implementation of the Python language a package support. With
> IronPython, PyPY and Jython becoming more and more stable it could be
> interesting for a package maintainer to indicate that his product
> actually supports one or several of them.

What specific package do you have the desire to record this information for?

Regards,
Martin

From sh at defuze.org  Wed Feb 28 01:35:06 2007
From: sh at defuze.org (Sylvain Hellegouarch)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:35:06 +0000
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Python implementations support
In-Reply-To: <45E4BFF0.7090604@v.loewis.de>
References: <45E42FB8.5010908@defuze.org> <45E4BFF0.7090604@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <45E4CE3A.9090602@defuze.org>

Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> Sylvain Hellegouarch schrieb:
>> I was wondering if it would be valuable to add the information about
>> which implementation of the Python language a package support. With
>> IronPython, PyPY and Jython becoming more and more stable it could be
>> interesting for a package maintainer to indicate that his product
>> actually supports one or several of them.
> 
> What specific package do you have the desire to record this information for?
> 
> Regards,
> Martin

If I requested this it's because I have actually made the effort to
ensure that two products [1] I had written where working under
IronPython. Then I realized I wanted to know which other products I
could safely try using with IronPython because their maintainer had
tried so.

Now it might sound like a useless piece of information currently but I
think it could be quite handy once the other implementations get a
bigger community.

>From your tone I have the feeling you find that idea utterly stupid.
Could be wrong of course.

If this doesn't happen in cheeshop then I might eventually setup my own
wiki for this specific feature but I don't see the point of spreading
information in different places.

- Sylvain
[1] http://trac.defuze.org/wiki/AmpleeIronPython

From martin at v.loewis.de  Wed Feb 28 07:11:33 2007
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:11:33 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Python implementations support
In-Reply-To: <45E4CE3A.9090602@defuze.org>
References: <45E42FB8.5010908@defuze.org> <45E4BFF0.7090604@v.loewis.de>
	<45E4CE3A.9090602@defuze.org>
Message-ID: <45E51D15.6080905@v.loewis.de>

Sylvain Hellegouarch schrieb:
>> What specific package do you have the desire to record this information for?
>>
>>From your tone I have the feeling you find that idea utterly stupid.
> Could be wrong of course.

It was a simple one-sentence question, so there isn't any tone in it...
Saying that you want it for amplee would have been good enough
an anwser.

I do doubt that many authors of packages actually have that information
available whether their package runs on anything but CPython. However,
introducing the feature for one package is fine, IMO - introducing it
for zero packages would have been a waste of time.

Regards,
Martin

From sh at defuze.org  Wed Feb 28 11:55:36 2007
From: sh at defuze.org (Sylvain Hellegouarch)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:55:36 +0000
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Python implementations support
In-Reply-To: <45E51D15.6080905@v.loewis.de>
References: <45E42FB8.5010908@defuze.org> <45E4BFF0.7090604@v.loewis.de>
	<45E4CE3A.9090602@defuze.org> <45E51D15.6080905@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <45E55FA8.5060800@defuze.org>

Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> Sylvain Hellegouarch schrieb:
>>> What specific package do you have the desire to record this information for?
>>>
>> >From your tone I have the feeling you find that idea utterly stupid.
>> Could be wrong of course.
> 
> It was a simple one-sentence question, so there isn't any tone in it...
> Saying that you want it for amplee would have been good enough
> an anwser.
> 

Hmm sorry about that I had to work all night yesterday and I was a bit
tired... seeing evil everywhere :p

- Sylvain

From vajda at osafoundation.org  Wed Feb 28 22:02:03 2007
From: vajda at osafoundation.org (Andi Vajda)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:02:03 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Category for Chandler
Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.64.0702281254310.11478@yuzu.local>


  Dear Cheese Shop maintainers,

My name is Andi Vajda and I work on the Chandler project [1] here at OSAF.

As we are nearing our "Preview" release we are working on our Chandler plugin 
solution and we would like to use the Python Cheese Shop as the entry point 
for OSAF and Chandler users to register and find plugins at.

We have about half a dozen plugins more or less ready to be registered with 
the Cheese Shop. What would it take to get a 'Chandler' category created for 
these plugins ?

We would then point a menu item in the Chandler UI at that category-specific 
URL at the Cheese Shop to find Chandler plugins with.

Thank you for your assistance !

Andi..

[1] http://chandler.osafoundation.org/

From richardjones at optusnet.com.au  Wed Feb 28 22:57:41 2007
From: richardjones at optusnet.com.au (richardjones at optusnet.com.au)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:57:41 +1100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Category for Chandler
Message-ID: <200702282157.l1SLvfDM026371@mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20070301/0353c2bc/attachment.pot